Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
2 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
3 | DANIEL Chloe L. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
3 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
5 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
6 | FELAND Alexandra | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
7 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
8 | KIM Jayna | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
9 | BEI Karen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
10 | CHOI Eunice | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
11 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
12 | ZHANG mickey | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
13 | WANG Nora | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
14 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
15 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
16 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
18 | JIN Jasmine | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
19 | DONDISCH Sophia | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
21 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
22 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
23 | HSU Adele Y. | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
24 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
25 | MADRID Maureen | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.