Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BARBER William S. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | |
2 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
3 | REYES Xavier M. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
3 | SWORDS Evan F. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
5 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
6 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% |
7 | KOTOV Leonid | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | |
8 | BREIER Satchel E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
9 | ROBERTS Sam | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 14% |
10 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
11 | GHENEA George Philipe | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% |
12 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
13 | TANN Justin | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
14 | BRISTOL Brijen | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
15 | HASNAH Henry | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 32% | 6% | |
16 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
17 | LIN Daniel | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
18 | LEITH Jack | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
19 | CHENG Albert | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
20 | WESLER Logan A. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
21 | CHEN Lucas B. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
22 | CAISSE Simon B. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
23 | HAWKINS Jasper R. | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
24 | LIU Christopher X. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
25 | BYON Julian | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
26 | KUMAR Sachit | 11% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
27 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
28 | VO Minh Q. | 2% | 16% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | WALLACE Taylor | 2% | 17% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
30 | LO Andrew T. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
31 | REED Samuel J. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
32 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
33 | SCHWINN Maxwell D. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
34 | PLONKA Derek | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | LO Konnor | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
36 | ZHANG Yankun | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
37 | CENTENO Zachary | 31% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
38 | YOO Joshua H. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
39 | BYON Adrian | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
40 | GOMES John F. | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
41 | RICHARDSON Troy A. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
42 | DHANANI Zain | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | SHIFTER Noah | 39% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | REED Robert | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
45 | STONE Brad | 30% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | GUO Brian | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.