Myrtle Beach Convention Center, Hall A - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 2 | LIU Nicole | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 3 | MACEDON Gianna | 2% | 19% | 47% | 28% | 5% | |
| 3 | GILKES Sanojah Ruby | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 5 | EDWARDS Auprell | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 6 | YU Sheerea | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 7 | BARCLAY Khyri | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | BYBEE Lucy J. | - | 2% | 19% | 47% | 31% | |
| 9 | PATIL Amulya | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 31% | |
| 10 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | 4% | 28% | 49% | 18% | 2% |
| 11 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 12 | CAI Catelynn | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 13 | YOON Katherine | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 14 | MIHILL Margaret | 25% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 15 | PARK Judy | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 16 | ENGLISH Marli | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | TRACY Samarra | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 19 | NEELAM Neha | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | DONGES Anna | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | HABER Emily | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | SANDERS Charlotte | - | 4% | 21% | 47% | 26% | 2% |
| 24 | GOSART Hailee | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | HU Chelsea | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 26 | KUMAR Anusha | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | WANG Zarina | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | OZBOZ almira | 23% | 55% | 20% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.