Fairfax Challenge ROC/RJCC/RYC & Y8

Division II Men’s Foil (DV2MF)

Sunday, January 21, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2626 2749 - 2521
5 - 8 2326 2386 - 2276
9 - 16 2132 2291 - 1949
17 - 25 1624 2024 - 1230

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Parrish, Evan AIC Fencing Club C23 2749 2496.36
2 sheng, Dalton AIC Fencing Club C23 2688 2435.36
3 Kim, Brian Space City Fencing Academy C23 2546 2290.24
4 Griffith McAllister, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D23 2521 2264.35
5 Mao, Lucas AIC Fencing Club C23 2386 2136.68
6 Piterbarg, Maxim Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) C22 2329 2064.26
7 Moorhouse, Emmett Tidewater Fencing Club D23 2311 2008.59
8 Black, Zachary Fencing Academy Of Philadelphia C23 2276 2005.48
9 Converse, Warren Nova Fencing Club C23 2288 1948.74
10 Peck, Quinn Bucks County Academy Of Fencing - West D23 2208 1935.25
11 Levy, Jacob AIC Fencing Club C23 2178 1920.70
12 Janney, Jonathan Bucks County Academy Of Fencing - West E22 2291 1911.14
13 Prut, Anton Apex Fencing Academy E23 2125 1846.69
14 Marisi, Gabriel Lang Fencing Academy D23 2060 1806.65
15 Xu, Dinghui Ryan Homewood Fencing Club D22 1955 1643.39
16 Lee, Ethan OnTarget Fencing Club E23 1949 1636.40
17 Kim, Andy Space City Fencing Academy D22 1995 1634.47
18 Rothman, Matthew Research Triangle Fencing E23 2012 1615.43
19 McLaughlin, Ryan New Jersey Fencing Alliance D23 2024 1565.33
20 DANIZ, FERNANDO Doral Fencing Club E23 1809 1413.93
21 Lee, Hans OnTarget Fencing Club U 1474 1035.51
22 Rojas, Elijah Bucks County Academy Of Fencing - West U 1369 949.69
23 Nsubuga, Jeffrey University of Maryland Baltimore County E22 1424 924.99
24 Candelaria, Armando Nova Fencing Club U 1277 665.34
25 Than, Duc Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1230 646.80

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!