Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LUNG Katerina | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
2 | CHEN Allison V. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | JING Emily | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | SENIC Adeline | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
5 | PEVZNER Victoria | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
6 | LIU Jaelyn A. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
7 | GUERRA Sofia E. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
8 | ORVANANOS Anice | D D D V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
9 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
10 | CHO Rebecca H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
11 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | SHEN Lydia | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
13 | CHEN Jia P. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
14 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
15 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | V V D D V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
16 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | D D V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
17 | SOOD Ishani S. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
18 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | PENG Amber L. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
20 | SUN Ruoxi | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
21 | ZHANG Alina C. | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
22 | CHUSID Mikayla | D V D V V V | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
23 | CHEW Alexis T. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
24 | ZHENG Julie | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
25 | CHOW Annabelle | V V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
26 | CALISE Ella | V D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
27 | ZHAO Sophie L. | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | SEO IRENE Y. | V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
29 | HOBSON Ava | V D V V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
30 | CANNON Lira J. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
31 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
32 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D V D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
33 | KOSTELNY Alexis | V V V V D V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
34 | WANDJI Anais | V D V V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
35 | LEE Lavender | V V V V D V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
36 | MI Aileen | V V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
37 | CHANG Elizabeth | D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
38 | YANG Iris | V D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
39 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | D V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
40 | SIMONOV Dasha | V V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
41 | SOLDATOVA Maria | V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
42 | SHA Yi Ling | V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
43 | COOPER Piper W. | D D D V V V | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 | |
44 | FEDELI Caterina S. | D D V V V D | D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
45 | RAO Sonia D. | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | GU EMILY | D D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
47 | BIODROWICZ Julia | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
48 | CHEN Chloe I. | D V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
49 | SKOURLETOS Maria | V D D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
50 | BATRA Chaahat | V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
51 | LI Sophia M. | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
52 | GOOR Viviene E. | D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
53 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
54 | EYER Hailey M. | V D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
54 | HWANG Alison | V D D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
56 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | V D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
57 | MANIKTALA Prisha | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
58 | BEAVER Hannah | V D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
59 | CASTANEDA Keira | D V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
60 | SHENG Chuxi | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
61 | VO Bao-Vy | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
62 | SHIM Grace | V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
63 | LUO Sandra J. | D D D V D D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
64 | ZHANG Eunice | D D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
65 | SULTER Aurelie | D D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
66 | HAN Crystal | D V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
67 | PAULUS Sloane | V V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
68 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
69 | PAULUS Isabella | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
70 | ENRILE Erica | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
71 | ZHENG Zoe | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
72 | TSANG Catherine | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
72 | LAI Sophia | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
74 | KIM Rachel | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
75 | BOLES Amanda X. | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
75 | AIRES Julia | D D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
77 | KO Claire | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
78 | MADSEN Ansley | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
79 | HAN Ashley | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
80 | LENK Sophie | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
81 | WANG Zoie Z. | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
82 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
83 | KOGAN Alexis | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
84 | YU Jane | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
85 | ALKADI Mai | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
86 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.