Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | JI Cody Walter | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
2 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | CHON Taylor A. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | MORRILL William | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
5 | WOODWARD Connor | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
6 | WANG Eric Y. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
8 | HJERPE Wade H. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
9 | WANG Robert | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
10 | ZUBATIY Samuel | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
11 | KIM Alexander M. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
12 | ERMAKOV Lev | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
13 | BERRIO Carter E. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
14 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
15 | SHOMAN Noah | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
16 | VAUGHN Jason | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
17 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
18 | FENG Leo | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
19 | BAE Jason I. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
20 | QIU Nathan | V V V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
21 | CHAN Matthew | V V V V D V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
22 | HONG Steven | D V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
23 | SHOMAN Zachary | V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | HOLZ Daniel | V D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
25 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
26 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
27 | YUN Jake | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
28 | LUO George F. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
29 | NG Jeremiah | D V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
30 | LIN Daniel | D V V D V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
30 | ZHANG Derek | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
32 | KUMAR Sachit | V D D V D V | V V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
33 | CHEONG Heonjun | V V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
34 | MAY Griffin M. | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
35 | AVAKIAN Alec | D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
36 | MORALES Jonathan | D V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
37 | WANG Nicolas | V V V D D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | CHOI Silas | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | KWALWASSER Eric | D V D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
40 | REN James | V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
41 | STONE Esmond A. | V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
42 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
43 | YANG Dylan | V V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
44 | LIM William J. | V D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
45 | MICLAUS Justin | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
46 | SU Landon | V D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
47 | KILARI Krish | D V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
48 | CHAN Aidan | V V V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
49 | LIU Christopher X. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | KROON Lucas | V D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
51 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
52 | HUANG Alex F. | V D D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
53 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
54 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
55 | DUDNICK Christian | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
56 | ZHANG Ethan W. | D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
57 | HOLZ William A. | D V D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
58 | HU Christopher | D D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
59 | PRIMUS Nazir | D D V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
60 | COOK Cole | V D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
61 | KALPATHY Rohit | D D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
62 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
63 | WU Richard | D D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
64 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | D D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
65 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | V D D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
66 | YU Thomas | V D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
67 | TSAI Michael T. | D V V V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
68 | KERCHER Alexander | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
69 | JORGESON Charlie | D D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
69 | BYBEE Matthew | V D D D V D | D | 0.3 | 2 | +1.7 |
71 | NIETO Titus P. | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
72 | LO Bradley | V D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
73 | ZHOU James Y. | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
74 | LIN Philip T. | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
75 | HUNG Samuel | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
76 | CRAIG Samuel | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
77 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
78 | WILKINSON James | D D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
79 | NGUYEN Anthony | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
80 | CHEN Evan P. | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
81 | GUFFEY Christopher | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
82 | TANG Charles | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
83 | FLITSANOV Macabee | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
84 | DECK Tyson | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
85 | GONG Jerry | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
86 | CUNNINGHAM-SNELSON Aahil | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
87 | CRAIG Andrew | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
88 | PAN Alex | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
88 | RODGERS Jacob | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
90 | FANG Eason | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
91 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
92 | GUREVICH Savely | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
92 | LIU Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
92 | WANG HongXi | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.