The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

April NAC

Y-12 Women's Foil

Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 1:30 PM

Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Jaelyn A. - - - - 2% 20% 79%
2 AMR HOSSNY Sara - 1% 7% 28% 43% 22%
3 SEO IRENE Y. - - 6% 26% 44% 23%
3 ORVANANOS Anice - 1% 11% 32% 39% 16%
5 CHANG Elizabeth - 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
6 LIU Angel(Daying) - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
6 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - - 1% 10% 31% 41% 17%
8 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - - - 7% 52% 40%
9 GOOR Viviene E. - - - 4% 19% 44% 33%
10 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - - - 4% 30% 66%
11 WANG Zoie Z. - - 1% 13% 40% 39% 6%
12 CHO Rebecca H. - - - 4% 20% 44% 31%
13 FEDELI Caterina S. - - - - 6% 47% 46%
14 LI Sophia M. - - 4% 28% 44% 22% 2%
15 NISSINOFF Alexandra - 1% 9% 30% 41% 20%
16 LEE Lavender - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 29%
17 CHEN Renee - - 3% 16% 42% 35% 4%
18 BIODROWICZ Julia - 1% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
19 CHEN Chloe I. - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
19 CHOW Annabelle - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
21 CALISE Ella 1% 10% 32% 40% 16% 1% -
22 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 26%
23 SUN Chloe - 1% 6% 23% 38% 27% 7%
24 YAN Noelle - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23% 2%
25 BOLES Amanda X. 1% 6% 22% 36% 26% 8% 1%
26 ZHENG Julie - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
27 SHA Yi Ling - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
28 HAN Ashley - 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2%
29 YANG Iris - 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 2%
30 CASTANEDA Keira - - 1% 9% 29% 42% 18%
31 ZHANG Eunice - 4% 22% 40% 28% 7%
32 VO Bao-Vy - 9% 33% 38% 17% 3%
33 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 7% 1%
34 KIM Rachel - 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
35 HAN Crystal - 5% 25% 41% 24% 5%
36 MANIKTALA Prisha - 3% 18% 37% 30% 10% 1%
37 SHIM Grace 8% 28% 37% 21% 6% 1% -
38 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1% -
39 SHEN Emilia 7% 30% 39% 20% 3% - -
40 BEAVER Ava 5% 41% 39% 14% 2% -
41 ZHENG Zoe 22% 48% 25% 5% - -
42 PAULUS Sloane 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
43 TEPMAN Alexandra D. 15% 40% 33% 11% 2% - -
44 MI Aileen - 4% 19% 40% 33% 4% -
45 YU Jane 24% 46% 25% 5% - - -
46 DAVIS Logan 3% 18% 38% 30% 10% 1% -
47 AIRES Julia 14% 41% 33% 11% 2% - -
48 HSU Kaylin 1% 33% 41% 20% 5% 1% -
49 REN Kayley 5% 31% 49% 13% 1% - -
50 ZHANG Gwenyth 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1% -
51 COLLINS Anna 1% 11% 37% 36% 13% 2%
52 SHENG Chuxi - 2% 14% 32% 34% 16% 2%
53 YANG Audrey 16% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
53 ZHANG Ivy 37% 47% 15% 2% - - -
55 KO Claire 26% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
56 FENG Grace 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
57 SAIFEE Lamya 23% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
58 KUMBRINK Emily 12% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
59 LUO Miranda - 1% 12% 38% 36% 11% 1%
59 DESERANNO Seren 4% 24% 40% 24% 7% 1% -
61 SWANSON Alexa 34% 44% 19% 3% - - -
62 LENK Sophie 44% 43% 12% 1% - -
63 CANO Sofia 81% 18% 1% - - -
64 RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone 14% 37% 33% 13% 3% - -
65 QUINTERO Camila 12% 36% 36% 14% 2% - -
66 HOM Avery 92% 8% - - - - -
67 ALKADI Mai 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
68 LAI Sophia 12% 37% 36% 14% 2% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.