Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% |
2 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
3 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
3 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
5 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
6 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
6 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
8 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 52% | 40% |
9 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
10 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
11 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 39% | 6% |
12 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
13 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 47% | 46% |
14 | LI Sophia M. | - | - | 4% | 28% | 44% | 22% | 2% |
15 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
16 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
17 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 35% | 4% |
18 | BIODROWICZ Julia | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
19 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
19 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
21 | CALISE Ella | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | 1% | - |
22 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
23 | SUN Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
24 | YAN Noelle | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 2% |
25 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
26 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
27 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
28 | HAN Ashley | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
29 | YANG Iris | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
30 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
31 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
32 | VO Bao-Vy | - | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
33 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
34 | KIM Rachel | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
35 | HAN Crystal | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
36 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
37 | SHIM Grace | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | SHEN Emilia | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
40 | BEAVER Ava | 5% | 41% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
41 | ZHENG Zoe | 22% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
42 | PAULUS Sloane | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
44 | MI Aileen | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 33% | 4% | - |
45 | YU Jane | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
46 | DAVIS Logan | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
47 | AIRES Julia | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
48 | HSU Kaylin | 1% | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
49 | REN Kayley | 5% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
50 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
51 | COLLINS Anna | 1% | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
52 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
53 | YANG Audrey | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
53 | ZHANG Ivy | 37% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | KO Claire | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
56 | FENG Grace | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
57 | SAIFEE Lamya | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | KUMBRINK Emily | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
59 | LUO Miranda | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
59 | DESERANNO Seren | 4% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | SWANSON Alexa | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
62 | LENK Sophie | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
63 | CANO Sofia | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
64 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
65 | QUINTERO Camila | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
66 | HOM Avery | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
67 | ALKADI Mai | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
68 | LAI Sophia | 12% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.