Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
2 | STONE Anne-Elizabeth | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | V V D V V D | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
3 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
5 | JOHNSON Honor B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | WOZNIAK Dagmara I. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
7 | JENKINS Ryan J. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | RUSSO Francesca | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
9 | SHELTON Aleksandra | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
10 | BURKE Nora S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
11 | LINDER Kara E. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
12 | WITEK Sophie B. | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
13 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | V D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
14 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | D V D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
15 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | V D V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
16 | BROWN Emma | V V D D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
17 | HARRILL Gillian N. | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
18 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | D V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
19 | THEODORE Maria A. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
20 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
21 | POSSICK Lola P. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
22 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | D V D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
25 | KOVACS Sophia | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
26 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
27 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | V D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
28 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | D V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
29 | CHANG Josephine S. | V D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
30 | TONG Kunling | V V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
31 | LEE Alexandra B. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
32 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
33 | MARSEE Samantha | V V V V | D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
34 | CAO Stephanie X. | V V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
35 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | D V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
36 | LACSON Sarah | V V V D V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
37 | LU Vivian Y. | D V D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | OISHI Megumi | D D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
39 | SHOMAN Jenna | D V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
40 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | D V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
41 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | V V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
42 | CHIN Erika J. | V V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
43 | KIM Zoe | V D V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
44 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
45 | PAK Kaitlyn | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | JULIEN Michelle | D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
47 | GORMAN Victoria M. | D V D V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
48 | KALRA Himani V. | D V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
49 | BLUM Leah I. | D V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
50 | GOUHIN Chloe | D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
51 | OLSEN Natalie J. | V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
52 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
53 | STAPLETON Lindsay K. | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
54 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
54 | HILD Nisha | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
56 | ATLURI Sara V. | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
57 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
58 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | D V D D D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
59 | BOIS Adele | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
60 | WALTER Zsofia R. | D D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
61 | LIN Audrey J. | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
62 | LU Amy | D D D V D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
63 | YODER Bridget H. | D V V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
64 | KONG Vera | D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
65 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | V D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
66 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
67 | MIKA Veronica | V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
68 | SATHYANATH Kailing | D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
69 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | D D D D D V | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 | |
70 | YUN Maya | D D D D V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
71 | TURNER Zoe Y. | D D D D V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
72 | LI Victoria J. | D V D D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
73 | HARRISON Imogen N. | D D D V D D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 | |
73 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | D D D V D D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 | |
75 | TURNOF Kayla M. | D D D D V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
75 | KATZ Anat | D D D V D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
77 | PRIEUR Lauren | V D D D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
77 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | D D D V D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
79 | SINHA Anika | V D D D D D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
80 | ALCEBAR Kayla | D D V D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
81 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | D D D D D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 | |
82 | SZETO Chloe | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
83 | STONE Hava S. | D D D D D D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 | |
84 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
85 | LARIMER Katherine E. | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
85 | NEIBART Fiona | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.