Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KOVACS Sophia | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
2 | CHAN Casey | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
3 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
5 | DANK Dina | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
6 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
7 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
8 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
9 | LEVITIS Danielle | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
10 | DRAGON Rainer | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 17% |
11 | PAUL Lila | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
12 | YUAN Greta | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
13 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
14 | ACOSTA PEREIRA Vilmarie | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
15 | SAYLES Nina R. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
16 | XI Shining | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
17 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
18 | NEIBART Fiona | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
19 | BROWNE Alexis G. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
20 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
21 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
22 | SHI Cathleen | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
23 | PIOVANETTI Diana | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
24 | MADA Skye | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
25 | XIKES Katherine E. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
27 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
28 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
29 | JEAN Olympe G. | 5% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
30 | MORAN Rhea | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
31 | WANG Jianning | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
32 | SHIH Christina | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | REN Xinling | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
34 | NATH Trisha | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.