Oaks, PA - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
2 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
3 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
3 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
5 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
6 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
7 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
8 | LI Alisha | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
9 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
10 | GANSER Yuliya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
11 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 21% |
12 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
13 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
14 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
15 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
16 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
17 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
18 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
19 | GAO Judy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
20 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
21 | SZEWC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
22 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
23 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
24 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
25 | IGOE Nirali B. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
26 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
27 | REDDYMEKA Sameera | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
29 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
30 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
31 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
32 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
33 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
34 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
35 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
36 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
37 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
38 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
39 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
40 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
41 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.