San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 2 | CHAN Aidan | - | 1% | 4% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 18% | 4% |
| 3 | JEFFRY Nicholas B. | - | - | - | 4% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 3 | LIU Christopher X. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 31% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 6 | LIN Daniel | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 7 | LO Andrew T. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 8 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | WINER Heath B. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 10 | KIM Ryan | 3% | 15% | 29% | 29% | 17% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 11 | YANG Dylan | - | - | 2% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 8% |
| 12 | ZHANG Yankun | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 13 | POFF Kainoa | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | CAISSE Simon B. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | YUNG Andrew | 9% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | PATEL Yash | 1% | 9% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | STONE Brad | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 18 | RAMANAN Govind | - | 4% | 15% | 28% | 29% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 19 | JUNG Edward | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 20 | BULLARD Bennett | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | LI Seth | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | TUNG Ryan | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.