The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | - | - | 2% | 17% | 51% | 30% |
| 2 | OH Samuel H. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 3 | LAO Scott E. | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 5 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 6 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 7 | WOO Christian | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% |
| 8 | MA Bryant | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | DANKAR Neel | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 10 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 11 | MA Andrew | - | 1% | 12% | 49% | 34% | 4% |
| 12 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 46% | 42% |
| 13 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 4% | 35% | 50% | 10% |
| 14 | ANDERSON Jacob | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 15 | YEE Johnathan | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 16 | LIM Charles Q. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 17 | PARK Sky | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | < 1% |
| 18 | SISINNI Riccardo | - | 1% | 21% | 46% | 29% | 3% |
| 19 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 15% |
| 20 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% |
| 21 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 46% | 19% |
| 22 | LLIDO Soren | - | 1% | 18% | 45% | 32% | 4% |
| 22 | WANG Ethan | - | 4% | 27% | 49% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 5% |
| 25 | SMITH Grant D. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | FINNEY Lorenz | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | CO Dylan | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | BAEK David | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | SHEN Owen | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 30 | TEH Ryan | 1% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | MYERS Dean | 2% | 18% | 49% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 32 | CHUANG Kian J. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
| 33 | EDISON Ansel | 13% | 49% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YU Leo | - | 4% | 34% | 43% | 17% | 1% |
| 35 | WU Lucas | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | FANG Jaden | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 38 | AGRAWAL Niki | 4% | 41% | 45% | 8% | - | - |
| 39 | RUBIN Max | 6% | 47% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LI Jett | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | LAM Nicolas | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU William | 5% | 42% | 45% | 8% | - | - |
| 44 | BOUCHARD Kai | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | TUAN Evan | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 46 | PETERSON Lucas | 41% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 41% | 52% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 48 | ROMO Ian | 13% | 55% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | ALBINALI Eissa | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | POTTS Diego | 46% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 49 | REICHEL Ezra | 32% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MAK Osman K. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Jonah | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.