December NAC

Cadet Women's Foil

Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHANG Yunjia - - 3% 16% 42% 40%
2 FANG Sabrina - - - - 6% 32% 62%
3 KIM Rachael - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
3 LEE Brianna J. - - - 2% 16% 44% 37%
5 WANG Ellen - - - 1% 8% 35% 55%
6 KONG Chin-Yi - - - 1% 12% 42% 44%
7 ZHAO Sophie L. - 2% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
8 GRIFFIN Emma G. - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
9 JING Emily - - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
10 SOOD Ishani S. - 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 9%
11 SHEN Lydia - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
12 PEVZNER Victoria - - - 5% 22% 43% 29%
13 LUNG Katerina - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
14 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" - - 4% 21% 43% 28% 5%
14 SHEN Sophia H. - - - 4% 19% 42% 34%
16 SENIC Adeline - - 1% 6% 27% 47% 19%
17 LOCKE Savannah - - 5% 23% 40% 27% 5%
18 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - 1% 5% 23% 46% 25%
19 EYER Hailey M. - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 19%
20 KIM Katherine - 2% 11% 30% 39% 18%
21 LIU Jaelyn A. - 2% 11% 31% 39% 16%
22 CHUSID Mikayla - - 2% 13% 31% 37% 17%
23 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - 1% 7% 30% 44% 18%
24 LI Rachel Y. - - 5% 22% 40% 28% 5%
25 OH Erin H. - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
26 MEI Sarah 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4% -
27 WANDJI Anais 1% 7% 25% 39% 24% 4%
28 KOROL Neta - - 8% 34% 45% 12%
29 CHEN Jia P. - - - 4% 21% 45% 30%
30 SUN Ruoxi - - 3% 16% 36% 35% 10%
31 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - 1% 11% 36% 40% 11%
32 CASTANEDA Erika L. - 1% 9% 28% 40% 21%
33 SARTORI Taylor M. - 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
34 CHEN Jessie S. - - 5% 22% 38% 28% 7%
35 HO Brianna W. - - - 7% 36% 57%
36 JANG Kimberley - 1% 11% 35% 40% 13%
37 CHO Gracie L. - 1% 5% 23% 38% 27% 6%
38 LIU Angel(Daying) - 3% 16% 36% 33% 10% 1%
39 COOPER Piper W. 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 3% -
40 LEE Lavender - 3% 21% 39% 28% 8% -
41 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia 2% 14% 33% 34% 15% 2%
42 ZHANG Alina C. - 1% 10% 31% 41% 17%
43 HU Victoria 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
44 UPTON Elizabeth 1% 8% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
45 DE LA CRUZ Eden - 1% 8% 24% 38% 25% 4%
46 LEE Ji Ahn 6% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1% -
47 GUERRA Sofia E. - 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
47 BATRA Chaahat - 1% 11% 31% 36% 17% 3%
49 FERNANDES Thea - 4% 24% 40% 26% 6% -
50 WU Julianna Y. - 2% 20% 47% 27% 4%
51 CHEN Allison V. - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
52 KOSLOW Amicie 7% 28% 38% 22% 6% 1%
53 CHO Cameron S. - 4% 19% 38% 31% 7%
54 YU Lauren C. 1% 9% 29% 38% 19% 3%
55 NISSINOFF Alexandra - 3% 15% 32% 33% 14% 2%
56 SEIGEL Norah - 7% 28% 40% 20% 4% -
57 GOOR Viviene E. - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
58 MI Aileen - 10% 38% 37% 12% 2% -
59 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
60 ORVANANOS Anice 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 3% -
61 DING Abigail 1% 8% 24% 33% 24% 8% 1%
61 HE Fenghuan - 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5%
63 NAMGALAURI Mariam 1% 9% 24% 33% 24% 8% 1%
64 CANNON Lira J. - 13% 33% 34% 16% 4% -
65 PENG Amber L. - 2% 21% 40% 29% 8% 1%
66 PARK Jaimie Lina 2% 17% 47% 28% 5% -
67 RANDOLPH Piper 2% 13% 32% 35% 16% 3%
68 WONG Sophia M. 3% 18% 35% 31% 12% 2%
69 LUO Sandra J. 9% 33% 37% 17% 3% -
70 SHIH Diane 1% 14% 39% 34% 11% 1%
71 SOLDATOVA Maria 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
72 KOSTELNY Alexis - 1% 6% 25% 42% 23% 4%
73 LAMBERT Mahala - 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
74 CHEN Chloe I. 5% 22% 34% 26% 11% 2% -
75 GU EMILY 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
76 YU Jaime L. 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4% -
77 TALWALKAR Apoorva - 2% 22% 40% 28% 8% 1%
78 HUANG NATALIE - 1% 12% 34% 37% 15% 1%
79 BEAVER Kaitlyn 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
80 MORADI Raiyan N. 3% 24% 42% 25% 6% - -
81 KONG Olivia - 6% 27% 42% 22% 4%
82 DRAGNE Alexis D. 11% 37% 35% 14% 2% -
83 KO Claire 64% 31% 5% - - -
84 CUI Amy 3% 21% 39% 28% 8% 1%
85 XIANG Emma 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
86 ZHANG Rongrui 7% 31% 39% 19% 4% - -
87 SEO IRENE Y. - 4% 27% 43% 21% 4% -
88 LIN Victoria T. 21% 44% 27% 7% 1% - -
89 RASO Olivia 10% 36% 37% 14% 3% - -
90 CHO Rebecca H. - - 8% 28% 40% 21% 3%
91 LEE Ariana 1% 11% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
91 TOBIN Brean 15% 38% 33% 13% 2% - -
91 WANG Alison 24% 42% 26% 7% 1% - -
94 ASCHETTINO Aurora 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1% -
95 CHARALEL Jessica 36% 43% 18% 3% - -
96 PHILLIPS Hattie 32% 49% 17% 2% - -
97 SIMONOV Dasha 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1%
98 QUINN Anna 40% 48% 11% 1% - -
99 KOROL Dana 7% 28% 38% 22% 5% -
100 CHANG Elizabeth 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
101 BURBERRY Livia 6% 53% 33% 7% - - -
102 WILLIS Fletcher L. 14% 37% 33% 13% 3% - -
103 BEAVER Hannah 5% 32% 41% 18% 3% - -
103 STRUGAR Steliana 14% 38% 33% 13% 2% - -
105 LIN Zhi tong 7% 24% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
106 ZAMELIS Madelyn 48% 43% 9% 1% - - -
107 BENNETT Abigail 64% 31% 5% - - - -
108 PARK Leah 14% 62% 21% 3% - - -
109 EUH Jayme 84% 16% 1% - - - -
110 DONDERIS Hannah E. 16% 37% 32% 13% 2% -
110 LIU Sophia 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
112 SHA Yi Ling 10% 43% 35% 11% 1% -
113 MARKOVSKY Nina 38% 42% 17% 3% - -
114 BOLES Amanda X. 18% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
115 LUH Mia P. 40% 42% 15% 2% - - -
115 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol 26% 52% 19% 3% - - -
117 MU Allison 30% 45% 21% 4% - - -
118 NIRGUDE Siddhi 76% 23% 1% - - - -
118 KUNDU TRISHA 90% 9% - - - - -
120 ROLOFF Katarina M. 29% 43% 23% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.