December NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 9:00 AM

Columbus, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V V V D V V V V V V V V 5.3 5 -0.3
2 JOHNSON Honor B. V V D V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
3 THEODORE Maria A. D V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
3 KAKHIANI-MECKLING Teodora D V V D V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
5 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
6 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V D V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
7 VESTEL Mira B. V D V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
8 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V D V D V V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
9 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. V V V V V V V V D 3.3 6 +2.7
10 LINDER Kara E. V V V V D V V V D 5.0 5 -
11 PAK Kaitlyn V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
12 JENKINS Ryan J. V V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
13 KIM Zoe V V V D D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
14 LU Vivian Y. D V V D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
15 GOUHIN Chloe D V V V V D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
16 LEE Alexandra B. V D D V V D V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
17 TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
18 SHOMAN Jenna V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
19 STONE Anne-Elizabeth V V D V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
20 GREENBAUM Atara R. V V V V V D V D 4.4 5 +0.6
21 ANGLADE Alexis C. D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
22 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
23 FREEDMAN Janna N. V V V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
24 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. D V V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
25 SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne V D D V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
25 LU Elaine D V D V V V V D 1.4 4 +2.6
27 ANDRES Charmaine G. V V D V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
28 TONG Kunling V D V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
29 XU Ellen D D V V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
30 ANDRES Katherine A. D D V V V D V V D 3.0 3 -
31 HARRILL Gillian N. D D D V V V V D 3.6 2 -1.6
32 LU Yi Lin D V D D V D V V D 2.0 2 -
33 MARSEE Samantha V D V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
34 TOLEDO AMES Julieta Isabel V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
35 WHANG Rebecca V V D V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
36 VADASZ Ibla P. V V V V D V D 2.4 5 +2.6
37 LI Amanda C. D V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
38 GORMAN Victoria M. D V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
39 JOHNSON Lauren D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
40 BLUM Leah I. V D V D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 OISHI Megumi V V D D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
42 LIU Lily V V V D D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
43 SZETO Chloe V D V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
44 HARRISON Imogen N. V V D D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
45 KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
46 OLSEN Natalie J. V V V D V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
47 GHOSH Priyanka D V D V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
48 KOVACS Sophia D D V V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
49 ADYNSKI Gillian I. V D V D D V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
49 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. V D V V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
51 POSSICK Lola P. V D D D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
52 BOIS Adele V D D V D V V D 3.0 3 -
53 CHIN Erika J. D V V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
53 PERRIER Eleonore V D D V V D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
55 TZOU Alexandra D D V V D V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
56 CHEN Xiaohan D D V V D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
57 CHANG Josephine S. V D D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
58 CHIN Sophia J. D D V V V D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
59 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
60 ERIKSON Kira R. V V D D D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
61 ENDO Miyuki N. D V D V D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
62 TAO Hannah J. D D D D V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
63 CHIOLDI Mina D D V V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
64 LEE Hannah V D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
65 MOZHAEVA MARIA V V D V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
66 KALRA Himani V. V V V V D D D 3.3 4 +0.7
67 LI Victoria J. D V D V V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
68 FOUR-GARCIA Madison D D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
68 KATZ Anat D V D V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
68 CHEN Jane V D V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
71 SADIK HANA D V V D D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
72 CARVALHO Isabela A. V D V V D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
73 BEVACQUA Aria F. V D V V D D D 2.5 3 +0.5
74 XI Shining V V V D D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 TUCKER Iman R. V V D V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
76 SATHYANATH Kailing V D D V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
77 TIMOFEYEV Nicole V D D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
78 FEARNS Zara A. V V D V D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
79 PRIEUR Lauren V V D D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
80 GHAYALOD reya D D V D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
81 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
82 CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. V D D D V D D 1.2 2 +0.8
83 STONE Hava S. D D V V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
84 LEVITIS Danielle D D V D D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
85 NEWELL Alexia C. D V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
86 BAKER Audrey C. D D D V V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
87 KER Grace D D V V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
88 DANK Dina V V D D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
89 CAO Stephanie X. V V D D D D D 3.7 2 -1.7
90 LIN Audrey J. V V D D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
91 JULIEN Michelle V D D D V D 3.7 2 -1.7
92 LUKASHENKO Angelina D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
93 GUTHIKONDA Nithya D V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
94 CODY Alexandra C. D D D V D V 2.4 2 -0.4
94 HILD Nisha D D D V D V 2.8 2 -0.8
96 LIU Sophie D V V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
97 BUHAY Rachel T. D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
98 BILILIES Sophia D V V D D D 1.1 2 +0.9
99 NEIBART Fiona D D V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
100 CALLAHAN Chase J. V D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
101 YUAN Greta D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
102 HASSAN Aziza R. D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
103 NATHANSON Sammy E. D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
104 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. V D D D D D 1.0 1 -
105 GREENBAUM Ella K. D D D D V D 3.1 1 -2.1
106 XIKES Katherine E. D V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
107 MIKA Veronica D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
108 DRAGON Rainer D V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
109 CHEN Xinyan V D D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
110 SHAY-TANNAS Zoe D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
111 LU Amy D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
112 BALAKUMARAN Maya D D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
113 WIGGERS Susan Q. D D D D D D 2.6 0 -2.6
114 ARNECKE Lauren A. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
115 LARIMER Katherine E. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
116 GLUCK Myriam D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
117 SINHA Anika D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.