Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% |
2 | GRADY Miriam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
3 | VERMEULE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 24% |
3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
5 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
6 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
7 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
8 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
9 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
10 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
11 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
12 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
13 | CHORNIY Kateryna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
14 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
15 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
16 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
17 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% |
18 | CEBULA Anne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% |
19 | DI TELLA Isabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
20 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
21 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
22 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
24 | KOMAR Sofia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
24 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
26 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
27 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
28 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
29 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | MAO Amy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
32 | WASHINGTON Isis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
33 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 49% |
34 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
35 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
36 | LU Junyao | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
37 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
38 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
39 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
40 | WEISS Talia L. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
41 | MYLER AnneMarie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
42 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
43 | KHROL Jaclyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
44 | HU Grace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% | - |
45 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
47 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
48 | WANG anne | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
49 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 18% | 1% |
50 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
51 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
52 | BASSA Francesca A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
53 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
54 | DYNER Karina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
55 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
56 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
57 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
57 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
59 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
60 | WANG Nora | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
61 | SEMIKIN Julia | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
62 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
63 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
64 | XU Grace (XinYi) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
65 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
66 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
67 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
68 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
69 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
70 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 14% |
71 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 10% |
72 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
73 | HENRY Asha S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
74 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
76 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
77 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
78 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
79 | MCLANE Lauren | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
80 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
81 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
82 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
83 | MAZUR Yeva | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
84 | DONDISCH Sophia | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
84 | LIN Waiyuk | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
86 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
87 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
87 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
89 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
89 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
91 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
92 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
93 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
94 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
95 | HUELLAS-BRUSKIEWICZ Marie-Rose R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
96 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
97 | LOMBARD Ella | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
98 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
99 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
100 | NING Emma | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
101 | ROBERTSON Lily | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
102 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
103 | LEE kyungmin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
103 | LEE Olive | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
105 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
106 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
107 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
107 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
109 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
110 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 8% |
111 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
112 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
113 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
114 | REID Sobia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
114 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
114 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
117 | IGOE Nirali B. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
118 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
119 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
120 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
121 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
121 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
123 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
124 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
125 | SZEWC Alexandra | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
126 | BELAOUSSOFF Kira | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
127 | DAVIS Jessica L. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
128 | WU Fan | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
129 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
130 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
131 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
132 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
133 | LI Alisha | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
134 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
135 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
135 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
137 | NORCONK Claire R. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
137 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
139 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
140 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
141 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
141 | BARON Sabina | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
143 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
144 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
145 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
146 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
147 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
148 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 64% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
149 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
149 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 100% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
151 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
152 | YIN Julia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% | - |
153 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
154 | BOTNER Olivia | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
155 | SHEN Stephanie | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
156 | GAO Judy | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.