Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% |
2 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
3 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
3 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% |
5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% |
6 | TAN Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | |
7 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
8 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
9 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
10 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
11 | CATANTAN Samantha Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
12 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
13 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
14 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
15 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% |
16 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
17 | SCRUGGS Lauren S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% |
18 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
19 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
20 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
21 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% | |
22 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
23 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
24 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
25 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
26 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
27 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
28 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
29 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
30 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 5% | |
31 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
32 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | HORSLEY Asherah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
33 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% |
35 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
36 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% |
37 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
38 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 2% |
39 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
40 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
41 | SABATINI Isabella Ravenne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
42 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
43 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 4% | |
44 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
45 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 6% |
46 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
47 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
48 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
49 | LEE Annora Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
49 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
49 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - |
52 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
53 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
54 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
56 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% | |
57 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
58 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
59 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
60 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
61 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
62 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
63 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
64 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
65 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 2% | |
66 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 14% |
67 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - |
68 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
69 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | |
70 | PARK Jaimie Lina | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
71 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
71 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
73 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - |
74 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
75 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
76 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - |
77 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
78 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 93% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
79 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 5% |
80 | TALAVERA Daena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
81 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
82 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
83 | MI Aileen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
84 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
85 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
86 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 1% | |
87 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | |
88 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
89 | DU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 7% | - | |
90 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
91 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - |
92 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
93 | MI Anning | 100% | 99% | 79% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
94 | DING Abigail | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
94 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 8% |
96 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
97 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
98 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 4% |
98 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
98 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
101 | SEIGEL Norah | 100% | 97% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
102 | YIN Helen | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
103 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
104 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
105 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | |
106 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
107 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
108 | HALL Velma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 9% | |
109 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
110 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
111 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
112 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
113 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
114 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | - |
115 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 84% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
116 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
117 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
118 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
119 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
120 | LUO ZIWEN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | - |
121 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
121 | HE Xiangxin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
123 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
124 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
125 | SLOWINSKI Maia A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
126 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
127 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
128 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
129 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
130 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
131 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
132 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
133 | HU Victoria | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
134 | CUI Amy | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
135 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
136 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
137 | DONDERIS Hannah E. | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
138 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
139 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
140 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
141 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
142 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
143 | GU EMILY | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
143 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
145 | ZHANG Rongrui | 100% | 97% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
146 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
147 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
148 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
148 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
150 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
151 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
151 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | |
153 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
154 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
155 | BRADFORD Meeah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
156 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 97% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
157 | LAURIA Mariavittoria | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
158 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
159 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
160 | LAMBERT Mahala | 100% | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
161 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
161 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
163 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
163 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 83% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
165 | MU Allison | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
166 | LONG Madeline M. | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
167 | ROLOFF Katarina M. | 100% | 93% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
168 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
169 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
170 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 78% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
171 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 98% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
172 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
173 | ZHUANG Sophie | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
174 | LIN Zhi tong | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
175 | WANG Alison | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
176 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
177 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
178 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 57% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
179 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
179 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
181 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
182 | GAO Anna | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
183 | HAAS Claire | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
184 | JACINTO JENNA R. | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
184 | ANTAL Chandini | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
184 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
187 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
187 | NIRGUDE Siddhi | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
189 | EUH Jayme | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.