Metuchen, NJ - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% | |
| 2 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% |
| 3 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 3 | CHENG Cody | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
| 5 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 6 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
| 7 | WANG Oscar | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 8 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
| 9 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 10 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 11 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 12 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 13 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 14 | STERN Tobias | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 15 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | DELISSER Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 18 | GOLD Carter | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 19 | SINGH Angadh | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 21 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 93% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | ZHOU Grant | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | ONG Chinli | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 25 | KOGAN Nikita | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
| 26 | ZHANG Zhihan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 27 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 28 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | IDRISSI Idris | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | LASKOW Oliver | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 95% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | SIMATOS Luka D. | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | O'GRADY Declan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HOU Bowen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | SINGER Marcus | 100% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MENDOZA Luca | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 38 | BARUAH Shaurya | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.