King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SMITH Grace L. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
| 2 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 3 | LIU Christina A. | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 20% | |
| 3 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 26% | |
| 5 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 6 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 7 | MING Cynthia | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 8% | |
| 8 | MAO Amy | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 9 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 10 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 32% | |
| 11 | PAN Michelle | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 12 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 14% | |
| 13 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 14 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 1% | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% | |
| 16 | LI Alisha | 34% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | NGUYEN Kira | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
| 18 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 19 | SMUK Daria A. | 2% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | |
| 20 | REID Anousheh | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 12% | |
| 21 | NI Emma | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
| 22 | FAZZINI Angelina | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 23 | LIN Elaine | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 24 | SZEWC Alexandra | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
| 25 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 26 | HAFEEZ Hania | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
| 27 | MUELLER Emma M. | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 28 | WITTE Vera | 14% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | |
| 30 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 31 | FENG ge | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | VINE Melissa | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 33 | HU Chelsea | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | MUKHERJEE Aanya | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | DE JAGER Celine | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 36 | YANG Chloe | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 37 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 8% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | ZENG Katrina | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | SHU Youshan | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 13% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | HILL Phoebe | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 43 | RAI Ananya | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | CHANG Ella | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 46 | GUZZI Jordan | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | GOGINENI Gamana | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.