King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MORRILL William | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 2 | NOBLE Colin | - | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 14% |
| 3 | KIM Matthew | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 5 | DENG Andrew | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 6 | MORRILL Justin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 7 | HAN Daniel Y. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | < 1% | |
| 8 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 9 | BULL Anderson | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 10 | CADAMBI Roshan | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 11 | MARGULIES William | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 12 | DA GRACA Aidan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHOU Miles | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 14 | RAUSCHER Ryan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | OVERDECK Andrew | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 17 | ALTIRS Alexander | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 18 | PIWOWAR Alex | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | NG Jeremiah | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 20 | HONG Vincent Q. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 21 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 22 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 24 | MICLAUS Justin | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | COLE Alexander | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 26 | SANDERS Samuel B. | - | - | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 28 | CHEN Evan P. | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HUANG Alexander C. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 30 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 31 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | ELLIS Jonah | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 34 | PANDEY Neil | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | YUAN Kevin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 36 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 1% | 13% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | HUANG Tyler T. | 3% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 39 | BLEYMAN David | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 40 | OH Triton | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 41 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 42 | ZENG Noah | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 43 | HU Andrew | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 44 | TANG Charles | 13% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | POSY Daniel | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | LEONARD Charles | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SAVOY Luca | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | |
| 48 | OWENS Harrison J. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | GOLD Jackson | 10% | 30% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | WANG Robert | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 51 | VOSS Jeffer | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 53 | MOULTON Ian | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | NEUMANN-LORECK Oliver | 32% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | DEPEW Spencer | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | GOLD Carter | 49% | 46% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | RAGAN STEINSSON Sigurdur | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.