King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
2 | BROWN Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
3 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
3 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
5 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
6 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
7 | BUCHMANN Vivien | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
8 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
9 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
10 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
11 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
12 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
13 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
14 | NEIBART Fiona | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
15 | LEVITIS Danielle | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
16 | KRYLOVA Valery | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
17 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
18 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
19 | DEPEW Charlotte R. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
20 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
21 | YUAN Greta | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 35% | 11% |
23 | DANK Dina | - | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
24 | LU Elaine | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
25 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
26 | NI Sharon | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
27 | SINHA Anika | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
28 | SZETO Chloe | - | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
29 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
30 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
31 | LIAO Siwen | 1% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | MADA Skye | 11% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
33 | KATZ Anat | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
34 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
35 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
35 | WANG Jianning | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
37 | KAPOOR Anika | 44% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | DAMDINSUREN Sophie | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | BROWN Delaney | 42% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | NGUYEN Ella | 33% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
41 | ALANGAD Rhea | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
42 | MESSICK Maya | 33% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.