King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GU Sarah | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
2 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
3 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
5 | LIN Katie Y. | V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
6 | SMITH Grace L. | V V D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
7 | KIM Diane E. | V D D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
8 | HAFEEZ Hania | D V D D | V V V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
10 | SMUK Daria A. | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
11 | NGUYEN Kira | V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
12 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
13 | FALLON Kyle R. | V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
13 | LIN Elaine | D V V V | V V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
15 | CHAN Elizabeth | V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
16 | AZMEH nour | V D D V | V V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
17 | LIU Christina A. | D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
18 | LEE Yedda | D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
19 | REID Anousheh | V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
20 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
21 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
22 | MAO Amy | V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
23 | GAO Judy | V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
24 | PAPADAKIS Lily | D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
25 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
26 | LIU Nicole | V D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
27 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
28 | KORFONTA Jolie | D D V V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
29 | HAFEEZ Hiba | D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
30 | ZHU Serene M. | D V D V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
31 | FENG ge | D D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
32 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
33 | GABERKORN Nadia | D V D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
34 | MING Cynthia | D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
35 | YANG Chloe | V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
36 | FAZZINI Angelina | V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
36 | ZENG Katrina | D D V V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
38 | MAMEDOVA Farah | D V V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
39 | DESAI Meera P. | V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
40 | MUELLER Emma M. | D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
41 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
41 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
43 | LI Alisha | D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
44 | PRIHODKO Nina | D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
45 | SHU Youshan | D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
46 | LAMBERT Camille L. | V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
47 | BANKULLA Misha R. | V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
48 | KIM Rachael | D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
48 | RAI Ananya | V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
50 | KANEVSKY Samantha | D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
51 | CHANG Ella | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
52 | HU Chelsea | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
53 | EDELSTEIN Julie | D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
54 | GOGINENI Gamana | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
55 | WONG Alexandra R. | D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
56 | JAY Elena | D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.