Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | CHEN Renee | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | CASCONE Emily | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | KAPUSTINA Arina | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 5 | YANG Iris | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | YURKOVA Mariia | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 7 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 8 | CALISE Ella | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 9 | SHIM Grace | V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 10 | SIROTA Francis | V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | WANG Sunny | D V V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | PEVZNER Nicole | V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 13 | FENG Grace | D D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 14 | JOO Natalie | D V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | V V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | WANG Jolie Z. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | BERGEL Daphne | D V V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 18 | FIELD Elizabeth | V D V V D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 19 | PAULUS Sloane | V D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | SHENG Katherine | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | LIU Caydence | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 22 | ZELDIN Nadia | V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 23 | JIN Sophie | D V D D D V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 24 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 25 | WANG Amabel | D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 26 | FEDER Acadia | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 27 | MAJID Inaaya | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 28 | JIN Amie | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 29 | LI savannah | D D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 30 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 31 | MCFARLANE Asha | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 32 | NAGUIB Caila | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | LENZ Phoebe | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.