The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Jersey Clash RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men's Saber

Saturday, October 16, 2021 at 9:00 AM

Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KIM Shaun M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 22%
2 FLOT Tai A. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
3 BUCHMANN Finn D. 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
3 MICLAUS Justin 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 27% 5%
5 BABAYEV Gabriel A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 25%
6 BERMAN Luca 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 22%
7 GILSON Lucas B. 100% 99% 95% 76% 44% 15% 2%
8 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55%
9 MCCARTHY Gabriel 100% 100% 96% 80% 43% 10%
10 NOBLE Colin 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
11 HUANG Alex F. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 17%
12 KIM Matthew 100% 100% 98% 88% 57% 17%
13 SINGH Angadh 100% 96% 75% 37% 8% 1%
14 OH Triton 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 50% 15%
15 DENG Andrew 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 44% 12%
16 PRIMUS Nazir 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 3%
17 OKEEFE Mitchell 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 16% 2%
18 SHOMAN Noah 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 8%
19 HU Christopher 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 14%
20 SUGIURA Samuel 100% 99% 89% 59% 24% 5% -
21 WANG Robert 100% 100% 96% 82% 53% 21% 4%
22 COLE Alexander 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
23 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 30%
24 SHOMAN Zachary 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
25 WAXLER Seth B. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 23%
26 DOLAN Charles R. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
27 ZHOU Miles 100% 100% 93% 67% 30% 6%
28 YOU Jaden 100% 98% 84% 53% 19% 3%
29 FLITSANOV Macabee 100% 92% 61% 24% 4% -
30 CHEN Evan P. 100% 99% 93% 73% 41% 14% 2%
31 TENG MATTHEW 100% 91% 62% 29% 8% 1% -
32 GONZALEZ Emilio A. 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 19%
33 CADAMBI Roshan 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 7%
34 ZENG Noah 100% 99% 87% 53% 18% 2%
35 NG Jeremiah 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
36 DALAL Rohan 100% 99% 89% 65% 32% 9% 1%
37 EPSTEIN Oliver D. 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 12% 1%
38 POSY Daniel 100% 99% 90% 67% 33% 9% 1%
39 DEPEW Spencer 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 1%
40 MCCARTHY Devan 100% 95% 68% 30% 7% 1%
41 IDRISSI Idris 100% 97% 81% 46% 13% 1%
42 LEONARD Charles 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 6% 1%
43 FELDMAN Drew 100% 98% 84% 50% 18% 3% -
44 GLOZMAN Justin 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 5% -
45 TIAGI Daniel 100% 93% 68% 33% 10% 1% -
46 WANG Oscar 100% 91% 62% 28% 7% 1% -
47 TASIKAS Stylianos 100% 99% 91% 67% 31% 6%
48 GONG Jerry 100% 89% 56% 19% 3% -
49 REMMEL Benjamin 100% 88% 52% 15% 2% -
50 GOLD Carter 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% -
51 HOPPA Luke H. 100% 100% 97% 83% 47% 9%
52 KOGAN Nikita 100% 98% 80% 43% 12% 1%
53 ZHANG Jeffrey 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 6%
54 HONG Robert 100% 54% 15% 2% - - -
55 VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 6% -
56 MOULTON Ian 100% 94% 71% 37% 11% 2% -
57 HUANG Maxwell H. 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1%
58 KOVACH Jonah F. 100% 98% 76% 37% 10% 1%
59 ANAND Sahil Z. 100% 98% 82% 46% 15% 2% -
60 LASKOW Oliver 100% 47% 11% 1% - - -
61 SMINK Oliver 100% 99% 85% 53% 20% 4% -
62 ONG Chinli 100% 84% 41% 10% 1% - -
63 ZHANG Yupeng 100% 88% 56% 22% 5% 1% -
64 GINSBERG jordan 100% 99% 89% 63% 31% 9% 1%
65 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 18% 3%
66 DAI Gary 100% 96% 72% 34% 9% 1% -
67 ZHANG Zhihan 100% 90% 60% 25% 6% 1% -
68 GOLDMAN Robert 100% 89% 58% 23% 5% -
69 BELLA JARO Marcus Vincent 100% 29% 4% - - -
70 UH Daniel 100% 92% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
71 STUMACHER Ryan 100% 98% 75% 36% 10% 1% -
72 GILPIN Samuel 100% 86% 53% 20% 5% 1% -
73 FREDRICK Jameer 100% 94% 66% 27% 5% -
74 SHI Erick 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
75 LONKER Zachary 100% 85% 45% 11% 1% -
76 HOU Bowen 100% 37% 6% - - - -
77 XIA Eric 100% 91% 53% 16% 3% - -
78 MACKENZIE Calvin 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% -
79 LIU Joshua 100% 90% 54% 17% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.