Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NGUYEN Anthony | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | CLARK Aram | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | MEHAN Nicholas | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 3 | ALAVE Kyle | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 5 | BONETTI Brayden | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | NG Jonathan | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 7 | URSU Marcel T. | V D D V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 8 | HU Andrew | V D V D D D | V V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 9 | LEE Andrew | V V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 10 | KIM Ethan | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | FADEL Alexander | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | ZHAO Lucas | V V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 13 | WANG daniel | V V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 14 | LIN Philip T. | V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | OH Aster | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | LEE Griffin | D D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 17 | DOSTAL Maximilian | V V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | D V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | D V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | MONTALVO Matthew | V V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | PINTO Marcus | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | MCDONALD Finn | V D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | LASKOW Max | V V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 24 | WAXLER Ryan | D D V D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 25 | MORGAN Abrahm H. | D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 26 | DAI Zihou | D D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 27 | DE SIENA Salvatore | D D V V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 28 | ZHANG Ray | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | KENNEDY Tomás | D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 30 | DOMINIQUE Remson | D D D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 31 | MARTINSON Torm | D D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 32 | MEHTA Krish | D D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | DONG Joshua | V D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 34 | GOMEZ Emilio | D V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | RAJMOHAN Arya | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | CHENG Tyler | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | PAI Ayan | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 37 | OREN Daniel | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 39 | BALE ATMAN | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 40 | CAFFREY Ethan | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.