Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | EYER Hailey M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 3 | ROY Layla | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | YANG Iris | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 6 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | CASCONE Emily | V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | SHIM Grace | D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | YANG Lingting | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | LEVY Avery | V D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 11 | YURKOVA Mariia | V V V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | V V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | SIMONOV Dasha | D V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 14 | CALISE Ella | V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | FIELD Julianna | V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 16 | PEVZNER Nicole | D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | WANG Rachael | V D V D V V | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 18 | ZELDIN Nadia | D V V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 19 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | V V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | WEI Angela | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | LI Han | D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 22 | PAULUS Sloane | D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 23 | SHENG Katherine | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 24 | BERGEL Daphne | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 25 | PAULUS Isabella | D D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | MARTIRE Alessandra | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 27 | LIAW Elaine | D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 28 | WANG Reese | D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 29 | LI Eleanor | V D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 30 | MAJID Inaaya | D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | WANG Sunny | D D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | LI Katerina | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 33 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 34 | YU Jane | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | WANG Jolie Z. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 36 | BADLANI Diya | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | BURGESS Logan | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.