Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 2 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 3 | JOHNSON Honor B. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 3 | JULIEN Michelle | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 5 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 7 | HASSANEIN Toqa | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 8 | LIU Sophie | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 10 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 13% |
| 11 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
| 12 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | DANK Dina | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 14 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 15 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | OBRADOVIC Ana | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 17 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 18 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 3% |
| 18 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 20 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 32% | 2% |
| 21 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 22 | YUAN Greta | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | CHEN Celina Z. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 26 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | JOHNSTON Lily | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 29 | REN Xinling | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HE Lizbeth | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | NAYAK Anika | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | < 1% | - | - |
| 34 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 36 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 30% | 3% |
| 37 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% |
| 37 | JEONG Katie | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | LI Angela | 3% | 22% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | WANG Jianning | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | SHUM Cindy | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ALANGAD Rhea | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 44 | NAYAK Esha | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | YEN Natalie | 7% | 44% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | MESSICK Maya | 17% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 47 | SADOVA Olga | 1% | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | SPEARS Mya B | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 49 | FLATT Sophia | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | HORMEL Molly | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | MORAN Rhea | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | JENKINS Scotland | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | DAI Olivia | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | DUBETSKY Ashley | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.