Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Brendan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | WONG Jackson | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | MAO Lucas | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 5 | XU Andy P. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | GHEDINI Luca | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 7 | CHEN Ethan | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 8 | GULCHIN Mark | D D V V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 9 | KIAYIAS Aris | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | ZHAO Adam | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | FOGELSON Hugh | V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | XIE Jicheng | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | XU Nathan | D V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | HONG Logan | D V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | ZENG Rick | V D D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | WONG Jacob W. | V D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | MARTIN Darius | V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | CHENG Logan | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | O'LEARY Colin | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 21 | JIANG Oscar | D D V V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 22 | MO Ethan | V V D D D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | GOLDYUK Steven | D V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | ZHAO Ryan | D V D D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | MARTIRE Luca | D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | WEI JR Shan | V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | ZHANG ethan | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | BOBROW Silas | D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | TANG Royce | D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | V V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | UNGERER Henry | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 32 | TANG Terry | V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 34 | SHANNON Jack | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | BLACK Henry | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | SICAT Justin | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 37 | ANTE Michael | V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 38 | REN Ryan | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 39 | SHAW eric | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 40 | COSSROW Alex | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 41 | QIAN Zekai | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 42 | HUANG Jinyao | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 43 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 44 | KRZYWON Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.