Monroe 33 Tennis, Basketball and Sports - Monroe Township, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 2 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
| 3 | MCLANE Lauren | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 41% |
| 3 | HU Grace | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 51% | 29% |
| 5 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 6 | LI Alisha | 4% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 7 | LU Junyao | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | PAN Michelle | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 10 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 11 | WITTE Vera | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
| 12 | SHU Youshan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | REID Sobia | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 15 | MING Cynthia | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | FENG ge | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 17 | REMEZA Alissa | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | FURMAN Maria | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 19 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 20 | GAO Judy | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 19% | 2% |
| 21 | ZHU Serene M. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 22 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 23 | PRIHODKO Nina | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 24 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 26 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 5% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | ZENG Katrina | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | CHANG Ella | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | LI Fei | 10% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | HILLYER Megan | 55% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 31 | JOHN Venus | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | PALANSKI Cate | < 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 33 | HICKS Grace | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HANIN Katherine | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | SMITH Auynha | 20% | 50% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | MOK Chloe R. | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 39 | RAI Ananya | 10% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | BARREIRO Katrina | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.