San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Shawn | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
2 | RAHMAN Ali | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
3 | DAI Chengwen | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
3 | ENG Kyler | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
5 | YAO Tristan | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | < 1% |
6 | NICZEWICZ Charles | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
7 | WONG Alexander | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | < 1% | - |
8 | CHEN Aiden | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
9 | JHA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 41% | 14% |
10 | WU Nathan | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
11 | ARMSTRONG Hendry | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% |
12 | GACIOCH Noah | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 7% |
13 | LEUNG Dylan | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
14 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
15 | JAMES Kaden | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | KAVANAGH Callum | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
17 | ROMAN Anton | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 19% |
18 | WARK William | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
19 | CHAN Calvin | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
20 | DING Max | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
21 | JAO Aaron | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
22 | SONG Joshua | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
23 | KIL Isaac | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
24 | QUAN Leo | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
25 | HUA Nolan | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
26 | MA Weichu | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
27 | CHANG Ryan | 1% | 22% | 45% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
28 | NARAYANUN Advay | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.