San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | TANI tino | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 2 | KANG Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% |
| 3 | ZHANG KAIQI | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% |
| 5 | TANG Morgan | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 6 | XIAO Brayden | 6% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 7 | YANG Phillip | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 8 | KANG Jeremy | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 9 | HWANG Hagan | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | DAKKA-TONG Jonah | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 11 | DANG Kainoa | 5% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 12 | LI Philip | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHAO Aidan | 1% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 16 | FU BRANDEN | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | KROON Landon | 4% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 18 | HO Alden | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 19 | TANG Derek | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 16% | 1% |
| 20 | OU Rigel | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | RAMBHIA Smit | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
| 22 | MARSHALL James | 3% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 23 | LIN Sampson | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | DENG Austin | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.