San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | TANI tino | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
2 | KANG Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
3 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% |
3 | ZHANG KAIQI | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% |
5 | TANG Morgan | - | - | 4% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
6 | XIAO Brayden | 6% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
7 | YANG Phillip | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
8 | KANG Jeremy | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
9 | HWANG Hagan | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
10 | DAKKA-TONG Jonah | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
11 | DANG Kainoa | 5% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - |
12 | LI Philip | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
13 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
14 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
15 | ZHAO Aidan | 1% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - |
16 | FU BRANDEN | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | KROON Landon | 4% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
18 | HO Alden | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
19 | TANG Derek | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 16% | 1% |
20 | OU Rigel | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
21 | RAMBHIA Smit | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
22 | MARSHALL James | 3% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - |
23 | LIN Sampson | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
24 | DENG Austin | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.