Dynamo Fencing Center - Newton, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KUSHKOV Daniel | V | V V | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 2 | SHINCHUK Daniel | V V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 3 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 3 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 5 | MARGULIAN Grant Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | LEUNG Ian | D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 7 | WANG Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 9 | KIM Daehwan (Benjamin) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | KUMAR Arjun Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | KUSHKOV Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | MIRKIS Levi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | SHAPIRO Simon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | MITCHELL-KATZ Aaron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | HARUTYUNYAN Gevorg Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | SINGH Sumair Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | PATEL Arush Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | KLAUBER Rafael | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 19 | TUNIK Joshuah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | ROGOFF Arlo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | KUMAR Avinash Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.