Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond Fencing Club, VA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | POWERS Meredith R. | V V D V V | V V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | SLACK Mary-Stuart F. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 3 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | V V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 5 | MCKEVITT Caitlin R. | V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 6 | CARNEY Dorothy | V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 7 | STONE Madelyn L. | V V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 8 | FERGUSON Diane F. | V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | MILES Pam | D V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 10 | MOELLER Virginia | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | HAVERSON Civa | D V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 13 | HAVERSON Rana | D D D V D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 14 | SHANKS Jennifer | V D D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 15 | DOLLINGS Taryn | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 16 | POOLE Katherine | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 17 | WATERMAN Andie | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 18 | THORNTON Eva | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 19 | UHRICH Reese | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.