Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
2 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 26% |
3 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
3 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
5 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
5 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
7 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
8 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 10% | 1% |
9 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
9 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
11 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
12 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
14 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 24% |
15 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
16 | GORDON Tamar | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
17 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
18 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% |
18 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
20 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
21 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 13% |
22 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
22 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
24 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
25 | FAHRI Monir J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 10% |
26 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
27 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 18% |
28 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
29 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | SUNGA Arabella Krystienne M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
31 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
32 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | |
33 | CHAN Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% |
34 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
35 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
36 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 11% |
37 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
38 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
39 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 7% | |
40 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 7% | |
41 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
42 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
43 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
44 | PARKER Allegra H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
45 | CASHMAN Natalie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
46 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
47 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
48 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
49 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
50 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | LIM Isabel K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
52 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
53 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
54 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
55 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
56 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 99% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | |
57 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
58 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
58 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
60 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
61 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
62 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
63 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
64 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
65 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 4% |
66 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
67 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
67 | BUCHMANN Vivien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% |
69 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | |
70 | LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
71 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
72 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
73 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
74 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
75 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
76 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
77 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
78 | HAN Jeanette X. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
78 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
80 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
81 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
82 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
82 | KIM Emily | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
82 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
85 | KONG Isabel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
86 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
87 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 7% |
88 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
89 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
90 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
91 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
92 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
93 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
94 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
95 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
96 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
97 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
98 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
99 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 93% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
100 | THROWER Lola S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
100 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
103 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
104 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
104 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
106 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - |
107 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
108 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% |
109 | MERRIAM Katherine I. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
110 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - |
111 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
112 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
113 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
114 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
115 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
116 | SCHMITT Alana P. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
117 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
118 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
119 | BAWA Sanya | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
120 | YUN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% |
120 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
122 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
123 | CHEN Erica | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
124 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
125 | FAY Zoe A. | 100% | 68% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
126 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
127 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
128 | BOURGEOIS audreane | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
129 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 100% | 99% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | |
130 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
131 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
132 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 32% | 5% | - |
133 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
134 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
135 | BROWN Emma | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
136 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
137 | CHEN Jacqueline | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
138 | SPORN Melanie | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
139 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
140 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
140 | SUN Alyssa | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
142 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
143 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
144 | BELTRAN Emilia M. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
145 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 30% | 3% | |
146 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
147 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
148 | BAE EMMELINE | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
149 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
150 | MCMAHON Byronie | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
151 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
151 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
153 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 100% | 90% | 50% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
154 | GULATI Ria | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
155 | LU Amy | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
156 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
157 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
158 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
159 | CHEN Jane | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
160 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
161 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
162 | ZHANG Judy | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
163 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
164 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 79% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
165 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
165 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 58% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
167 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
168 | HUANG Tina | 100% | 67% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
169 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
170 | HOVERMAN Hannah A. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
170 | PIERCE Marlene | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
172 | LIN Selena | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
173 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
174 | HAYES Grace Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
175 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
175 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
175 | KITTLE Lauren | 100% | 32% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
175 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
179 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
180 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
181 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 100% | 65% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
181 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 100% | 53% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
181 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
184 | BAKER Amelia M. | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
184 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.