PTBA Basketball Association - La Puente, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 82% |
| 2 | SUN Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 47% | 19% | |
| 3 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
| 3 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 5 | FUNG Emma | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% | |
| 6 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
| 7 | HOBSON Ava | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 8 | SUN Emily | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | PENG Serena | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | LEE Allison | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | KO Claire | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | |
| 12 | WANG Celine S. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 14 | DO Leila | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 15 | FUNG Vera | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 16 | REN Kayley | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | SAIFEE Lamya | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 1% | |
| 19 | ZHENG Zoe | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 20 | YANG Audrey | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 22 | OH Ceana | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 32% | 3% | |
| 23 | HO Addison | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | LUH Mia P. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% | |
| 25 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 6% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | SHUM Maya | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 27 | ZHANG Ivy | 4% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | HSU Kaylin | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | ZHONG Aleena | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | BARTON Nanea | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | MCKAY Teresa | 16% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LENK Sophie | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | MONAT Jennifer | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | DESAI Esha | 2% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 8% | - | |
| 35 | CZAPLA Dominika | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Zara | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | MENDOZA TALAMANTES Aleydiz | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MENG Annabel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | XING Celeste | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 40 | UHM JIAH | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | PENG Charlotte | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | SWANSON Alexa | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 44 | CHANG Janelle | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.