PTBA Basketball Association - La Puente, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TORRES JIMENA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% |
| 2 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | |
| 3 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 22% |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 5 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 6 | PENG Serena | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 7 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 8 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% | |
| 9 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% | |
| 11 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 12 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 13 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 76% | 29% | 4% | |
| 14 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% | |
| 15 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% | |
| 16 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 17 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 54% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | KETTELLE Molly | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | - | |
| 20 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 4% | |
| 21 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 23 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 87% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 25 | GUAN Sophie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | GUAN Sydney | 100% | 84% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SUN Emily | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | DO Leila | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WANG Brina | 100% | 96% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | UHM JIAH | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | MORENO Francesca | 100% | 53% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 54% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | DROGA Jezabel | 100% | 46% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | GIVEN Katherine | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.