Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 17% |
| 3 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 5 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 6 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 7 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | JENKINS Morgan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 37% |
| 9 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 10 | AVAKIAN Mikaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 34% |
| 11 | JOHNSON Honor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
| 12 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 34% |
| 13 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 14 | WARD Reghan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 15 | SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 6% |
| 16 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 17 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 4% |
| 19 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 20 | MOSS Zara J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 14% |
| 21 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 35% |
| 21 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | DI PERNA Chiara I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% |
| 24 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 25 | CHAN Casey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% |
| 26 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 10% |
| 27 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 28 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 29 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% |
| 30 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 2% | |
| 31 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | TURNER Zoe Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 33 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 34 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HANADARI-LEVY Amit | 100% | 99% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 35 | PINCUS Lucy Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 35 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 14% |
| 38 | ZEGERS Anneke E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 39 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | WOZNIAK Kelli | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
| 41 | KATZ Anat | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 42 | WHITE Amber L. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 43 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 45 | LI Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 46 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 47 | WEBER Juliana I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 49 | FAHRI Monir J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 50 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 51 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
| 52 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 53 | BEALE Zoe M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 54 | SULLIVAN Caroline E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | - |
| 55 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 55 | WU JiaQi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | DRAGON Rainer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 57 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
| 60 | TIMOFEYEV Nicole | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SEHIC Cassandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | SUNGA Arabella Krystienne M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 63 | HILADO Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 2% |
| 64 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 65 | KOZAK Sonja A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 66 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 67 | BECKER Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 68 | SONG Jenny | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 69 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 70 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | |
| 71 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% | |
| 72 | PRIESTLEY Catherine (Cate) C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 73 | NGUYEN Thea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | |
| 74 | WITEK Sophie B. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 75 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 76 | HULSEBURG Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
| 77 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 77 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 79 | WALTER Zsofia R. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 81 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 82 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 82 | LI Victoria J. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 84 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 86 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 87 | KALRA Siya L. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 88 | SHEA Erin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 5% |
| 89 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 89 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 91 | KIM Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 92 | CANSECO Laura K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 93 | LIU Rachel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 94 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 95 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 96 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 96 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 98 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 99 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 100 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 101 | YANG Kaitlyn H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 102 | MORAN Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 102 | THROWER Lola S. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 102 | HAN Jeanette X. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 105 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 106 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 100% | 93% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 107 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 108 | CHEN Erica | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 109 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 109 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 109 | GULATI Ria | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 112 | YONG Annika A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 8% |
| 113 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 114 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 115 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 116 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
| 117 | PARKER Allegra H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 118 | ZHUANG Sophia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 119 | PINCUS Emma Y. | 100% | 74% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 119 | KONG Isabel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 121 | SOMFELEAN Clara M. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 122 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 123 | LAMOTHE Laurie-Ann | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 124 | VAN ATTA Grace Y. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 125 | CASHMAN Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 126 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 127 | DODRILL Brooke | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 128 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 129 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 130 | WU Zoe | 100% | 38% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 131 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 132 | FLOREZ Melissa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | 5% | - |
| 132 | BAWA Sanya | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 134 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 135 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 135 | CREUSOT Julia D. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 137 | CHAN Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 138 | SCHMITT Alana P. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 139 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 140 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 141 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 142 | BIENVENU Camille C. | 100% | 97% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 143 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 144 | CHEEMA Sophia | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 145 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 146 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 146 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 9% | - | |
| 148 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 149 | BOURGEOIS audreane | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 150 | LIM Isabel K. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 151 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 152 | WANG Caroline Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 152 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 154 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 155 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 156 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 156 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 158 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 159 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 161 | CHEN Jacqueline | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 162 | CALVERT Sarah-Jane E. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 163 | SUN Alyssa | 100% | 96% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 164 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 165 | CHING Sapphira S. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 166 | ZHANG Judy | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 167 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 168 | CHEN Jane | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 169 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 170 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 171 | MILLER Mattea K. | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 171 | BAE EMMELINE | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 173 | FALKSON Esther | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 175 | BALMASEDA Sabrina F. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 176 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 178 | MURPHY Niamh | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 179 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 179 | CUNNINGHAM Erin | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 181 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 182 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | 100% | 94% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 182 | LIN Selena | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.