Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Seren | 2% | 9% | 23% | 30% | 23% | 11% | 3% | - | |
| 2 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 2% |
| 3 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | - | 3% | 11% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 7% | |
| 3 | CHENG Emily | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 46% | 22% |
| 5 | RUPERT Ellie | - | 3% | 12% | 25% | 30% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 6 | KUMBRINK Emily | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - | |
| 7 | SANTOS Samantha Zoe | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | AADHI Hansika | - | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | MALONE Ella | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 10 | MORSE Katherine | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | STONE Sydney | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% | |
| 12 | LIN Kenzie | 2% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 13 | BOIKE Lucille | - | 1% | 8% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 14 | ADLER Zoe | 1% | 6% | 18% | 29% | 26% | 14% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 15 | KNAPP Isabella | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | AWAD Phoebe | 3% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - | |
| 17 | RUSH Tara | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.