November NAC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Monday, November 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM

Kansas City, MO - Kansas City, MO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FANG Sabrina 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 48%
2 QIAN Crystal 100% 100% 100% 94% 74% 38% 8%
3 KNIGHT Skylar 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
3 KOO Rachel A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 45%
5 JING Alexandra 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 47%
6 CAO Arianna L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
7 HUNG Juliana K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 41%
8 HE Elizabeth W. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 12%
9 TALAVERA Daena 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
10 MASSICK Laine 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 10%
11 GAYDOS Sofia C. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 33% 5%
12 SARTORI Taylor M. 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 1%
13 GUERRA Sofia E. 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 26% 4%
14 ZHENG Ivy 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 28% 5%
15 STUTCHBURY Carolina J. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
16 HO Brianna W. 100% 100% 100% 93% 64% 22% 2%
17 PETROVA Kristina 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 20%
18 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 21%
19 PEVZNER Victoria 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
20 SERBAN Samantha M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 13%
21 MCGILLION-MOORE Katie 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 27%
22 LESLIE Ryanne T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 73% 31%
23 GRIFFIN Emma G. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 21%
24 CHENG Lydia A. 100% 100% 95% 76% 44% 14% 2%
25 KONG Olivia 100% 100% 94% 74% 40% 13% 2%
26 YU Seneca 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
27 CHEN Jessie S. 100% 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2%
28 CASTANEDA Erika L. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 9% 1%
29 TRAN Ava D. 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
30 KONG Chin-Yi 100% 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 7%
32 PALMER Meredith K. 100% 98% 82% 48% 16% 3% -
33 JING Emily 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 22%
34 XU Christine 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 12% 1%
36 WU Irene M. 100% 98% 86% 56% 22% 4% -
37 LEE Brianna J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 43%
38 LUO ZIWEN 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 27% 5%
39 KLINE Melissa C. 100% 100% 91% 51% 15% 2% -
40 DUAN Konnie 100% 100% 99% 80% 38% 9% 1%
41 BRADFORD Meeah 100% 100% 99% 95% 78% 45% 13%
43 HECKMANN Emma 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% -
44 KOROL Neta 100% 98% 86% 55% 21% 3%
45 TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 50% 13%
46 LI Phoebe J. 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 19% 2%
47 CHO Gracie L. 100% 100% 98% 83% 50% 17% 2%
48 LI Meilin 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 11% 1%
49 LUNG Katerina 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 24% 3%
50 DE LA CRUZ Eden 100% 93% 65% 28% 6% 1% -
51 HE Xiangxin 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 9% 1%
52 KIM Rachael 100% 100% 100% 97% 76% 35% 6%
53 SHAW Kayla M. 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 7% 1%
54 LIN Ashley 100% 97% 74% 34% 8% 1% -
55 SHIH Diane 100% 97% 76% 37% 10% 1% -
56 SHEN Sophia H. 100% 99% 91% 64% 27% 6% -
57 CHOI Lenna K. 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 42% 10%
58 WANG Ellen 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 14% 2%
58 ZHAO Sophie L. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
60 CHEN Allison V. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 36% 7%
61 DAVIA Daniella V. 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 25% 4%
62 HO Rachel E. 100% 79% 38% 10% 1% - -
63 YEH Marissa E. 100% 97% 78% 43% 14% 2% -
64 BATRA Chaahat 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 14% 1%
65 YE Eileen 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 15%
66 CHEN Jia P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 10%
67 FERRETTI Anna Rebecca 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
68 XU Marie-Anne J. 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
69 HUANG NATALIE 100% 88% 54% 21% 4% -
70 FERNANDES Thea 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
71 JANG Kimberley 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% -
72 PAPADAKIS Lily 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 42% 9%
74 KOENIG Charlotte R. 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2%
75 KHOO Lauren A. 100% 99% 88% 56% 21% 4% -
76 ZHANG Sylvia 100% 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
77 SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) 100% 88% 46% 12% 1% - -
78 YHIP Mikaela M. 100% 100% 99% 86% 50% 15% 1%
79 NEWHARD Zelia K. 100% 98% 80% 42% 12% 2% -
80 RASO Olivia 100% 86% 52% 20% 4% - -
81 HE Fenghuan 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 38% 7%
82 UPTON Elizabeth 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 28% 4%
83 CHO Cameron S. 100% 97% 83% 52% 21% 4% -
84 SOOD Ishani S. 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
85 PRIETO Sofia M. 100% 46% 10% 1% - - -
86 KIM Katherine 100% 100% 95% 66% 26% 5% -
87 CONVERSE Madilynn E. 100% 52% 13% 2% - - -
88 WU Catherine 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 11%
89 JO Mia C. 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 18%
90 KIM Hyunchae Y. 100% 64% 23% 5% - - -
91 LAU Chloe M. 100% 99% 91% 66% 31% 7% -
92 ALTEN Ayaka 100% 97% 76% 38% 11% 1% -
93 KOROL Dana 100% 96% 77% 42% 14% 2% -
94 DEBACK Greta I. 100% 63% 19% 3% - - -
95 CHON Sydney 100% 98% 83% 48% 15% 2% -
96 SUH Kailey E. 100% 96% 78% 44% 15% 3% -
97 WANG Catherine K. 100% 98% 74% 33% 7% 1% -
98 LEE Montana 100% 95% 68% 30% 7% 1% -
99 DING Abigail 100% 98% 68% 28% 7% 1% -
100 LOW Cher-Mayne 100% 98% 86% 57% 25% 6% 1%
101 TAN Clarisse 100% 98% 77% 35% 8% 1% -
102 YIN Helen 100% 91% 46% 12% 2% - -
103 WEBB Ella 100% 95% 61% 22% 4% - -
104 SHEN Lydia 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 2% -
105 LI Rachel Y. 100% 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1%
106 SU Alysa J. 100% 97% 70% 30% 7% 1% -
107 HICKS Bronwen 100% 34% 4% - - - -
108 LIAO Carly 100% 77% 22% 2% - - -
109 LOCKE Savannah 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 8% 1%
110 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 100% 87% 51% 18% 3% -
111 CHUSID Mikayla 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1% -
112 MUELLER Tatum J. 100% 49% 10% 1% - - -
113 XIE zoey 100% 78% 37% 9% 1% - -
114 YU Jaime L. 100% 87% 51% 18% 4% - -
115 OH Erin H. 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 5% -
115 TALWALKAR Apoorva 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 14% 1%
117 PERLMAN Talia 100% 100% 96% 76% 39% 11% 1%
118 DU Hannah 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
119 SULTANA-HOLE Olivia B. 100% 71% 28% 6% 1% - -
120 ATLURI Srija 100% 96% 77% 42% 12% 1%
121 SU Alena J. 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 20% 3%
122 DRAGNE Alexis D. 100% 83% 42% 12% 2% - -
123 WANG ROBIN 100% 43% 8% 1% - - -
124 MAESTRADO Ashley R. 100% 89% 57% 22% 5% - -
124 HSIUNG Samantha 100% 81% 12% 1% - - -
126 YU Nicole J. 100% 83% 46% 15% 2% - -
126 WANG Alison 100% 75% 34% 8% 1% - -
128 YU Lauren C. 100% 29% 4% - - - -
129 LABELLE Audreanne 100% 43% 5% - - - -
130 PFLAUM Philippa J. 100% 38% 6% 1% - - -
131 KOGAN Stella 100% 26% 3% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.