Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANTIPAS Michael C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
2 | SCARPA Ryan N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
3 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
3 | REYNOLDS Tyler C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
5 | GROSS Liran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% | 6% |
6 | FIELD Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% |
7 | WOODS Jack H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
8 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
9 | HEMPE Jake | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
10 | LESNIKOV Kirel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% |
11 | PANTEL Adam S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
12 | ZUSIN Zachary W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
13 | HOLMES Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
13 | HARTMARK Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
15 | ACINAPURO Philip M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
16 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
17 | RICCIO Frank J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
18 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
19 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
20 | PRINCE Nicholas J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | |
21 | CARMAN Ian K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
22 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 38% | 13% | 2% |
23 | MANGE Nathan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
24 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
25 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
26 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
27 | GU Jeffrey | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | CHU Derek | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
29 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
30 | ADLER Ian B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
31 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 17% | 3% |
32 | DIVENTI Paul W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
33 | VITI Mark G. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
34 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
36 | WANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
37 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
38 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
39 | PANTEL Glenn S. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
40 | DUNAT Maximilian (Max) D. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
41 | ENGEL Henry R. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
42 | HEALY Griffen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
43 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
43 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
45 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
46 | MA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
47 | SACCOCCIO Nicholas P. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
48 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
49 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
50 | GAEHDE Christian P. | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
51 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | SPIRLI Francesco | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
53 | SANTULLI Tristan | 100% | 85% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
54 | LI Yulei | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
55 | CHESTNA Samuel E. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
56 | MILLER Trent D. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
57 | KUZMAK Michael J. | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
58 | SOUMAKIS Sarantos G. | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
59 | SKOLNICK Michael W. | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
60 | FRERE-CAROSSIO Quentin | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
61 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
62 | OZSOLAK Alex | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.