St Louis, MO - St Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RIGHTLER Samuel | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 2 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 3 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 3 | BARBER William S. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 5 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 6 | CONINE Tanner C. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | RESHEIDAT Malik | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 8 | CHOI Silas | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | WANG Nicolas | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | NOBLE Daniel | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 11 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 12 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 14 | LIM William J. | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 15 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 16 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | LEITH Jack | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 20 | ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | CANNON Logan T. | 6% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | TSAI Michael T. | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CRAIG Samuel | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | HOUTZ Mitchell B. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | JOHNSON Kai | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.