St Louis, MO - St Louis, MO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | 12% | |
| 2 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 3 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 5 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 15% | |
| 6 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 7 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 8 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% | 4% | |
| 9 | SMITH Mitchell M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 10 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% | |
| 12 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | RIGHTLER Samuel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | CONINE Tanner C. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 76% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | CHENG Albert | 100% | 76% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | LIM William J. | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.