Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOO Jeein | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 2 | FANG Eason | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 3 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 3 | CHON Collin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 5 | HOLZ Lucas | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
| 6 | URSU Marcel T. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 7 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 8 | HWANG Jayden | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 9 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 10 | WANG Justin | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 11 | MUNGUIA Nathan | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | CRAIG Andrew | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 13 | GUREVICH Benjamin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 14 | SO Preston | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 15 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 16 | VO Maxwell | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | YU BOWEN | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | HO Anson | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | LIU Victor | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 20 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | BRIMMER Trey | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 22 | KANG Matthew | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | ZHANG Kaixuan | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | LI AYDEN | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | KWON Kenneth | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | TANI Tino | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | MEADE Liam Robert | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 28 | BOLLU Viren | 28% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | WANG Max | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 30 | YANG Justin | 39% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 31 | LI linze | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
| 32 | KIM Yusung | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHEN Cooper | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | FRAZIER Jaedan | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 36 | ZHANG KAIQI | 27% | 48% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | LI Yidong | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 38 | OU Rigel | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | BOSITA Brennan | 8% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | SOKOLOV Arseniy | 2% | 19% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | ALFRED Wesley | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.