Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | HUNG Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 2 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 3 | BARRIE Sadie Q. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 3 | DONG Angel | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 5 | JEONG Katie | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 6 | DENG Brooke | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 7 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 8 | CHEN Kevy | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 9 | LUKER Sophia | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 10 | YOUNG Audrey | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 11 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 13 | NAYAK Anika | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | GARRETT Madrid | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 15 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | TREACY Aisling | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | NAYAK Esha | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 19 | NICHOLAS Eva | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | MORAN Rhea | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | HUAI Delilah | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | FANG sophie | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LYONS Alexis | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 24 | ROSE Isabelle | 10% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.