Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 2 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 3 | CHEONG Heonjun | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 3 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 5 | REN James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 6 | CHON Collin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 7 | CRAIG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 8 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 9 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% |
| 10 | KERCHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 10 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | |
| 12 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | |
| 13 | BOSITA Carson | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 14 | GUFFEY Christopher | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 15 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 16 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
| 17 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 10% |
| 18 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 13% | |
| 19 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
| 20 | ROE Finnegan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 21 | SO Preston | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LO Bradley | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | JORGESON Charlie | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% | |
| 25 | ZHOU James Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | WILKINSON James | 100% | 97% | 70% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KALPATHY Rohit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% |
| 28 | FANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 29 | KENNEDY-DOMINGUEZ Cohen | 100% | 71% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 30 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
| 31 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 32 | LI AYDEN | 100% | 89% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 9% |
| 34 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 35 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 36 | WANG Max | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | KUSANAGI Soshi | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 39 | WANG Justin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
| 40 | URSU Marcel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 41 | MIRELES Jacob | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 42 | KO Zuriel | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | KWON Kenneth | 100% | 93% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 45 | WILKERSON Jude | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | KONGARA Ronit | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | MEADE Liam Robert | 100% | 60% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | ROSE Jacob | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 49 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 50 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 92% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | GUREVICH Savely | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | HO Anson | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 53 | BOLLU Viren | 100% | 70% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FRAZIER Jaedan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | LI Yidong | 100% | 86% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 58 | SOKOLOV Arseniy | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.