Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 2 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | |
| 3 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 5 | KOVACS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 6 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% | |
| 7 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 8 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 2% |
| 9 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 10 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 12 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
| 13 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 14 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 15 | HARRISON Imogen N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
| 16 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 17 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 18 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 19 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 20 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% | |
| 21 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | |
| 22 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 23 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
| 24 | XI Shining | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 26 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
| 27 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 28 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | |
| 30 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | KER Grace | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 34 | YONG Erika E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | KALRA Himani V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 36 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 37 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 38 | CHANG Josephine S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 39 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 40 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 3% | |
| 42 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 43 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 44 | SZETO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 45 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 9% |
| 46 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 46 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | TZOU Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
| 50 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
| 53 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
| 54 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 55 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 56 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 56 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 59 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 60 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 61 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 62 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% |
| 63 | BUCHMANN Vivien | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 64 | NOVICK Mia J. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 66 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 67 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 68 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 69 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 15% |
| 70 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 71 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 72 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 73 | FEARNS Zara A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 74 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 76 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 77 | XIAO julie | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 78 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 99% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 80 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 81 | CARVALHO Isabela A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 82 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 83 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 84 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 85 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 86 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 87 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 88 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 95% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 89 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 90 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 90 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 98% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 92 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 100% | 92% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 94 | KANTIPUDI Shrika | 100% | 93% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 95 | CHEN Athena | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 97 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 98 | LIN Selena | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 99 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 100 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 101 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 102 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 103 | GORDON Sarah | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 104 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | LU Elaine | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 106 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 107 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 108 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 109 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 100% | 91% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 110 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 112 | LUKER Sophia | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 113 | LIGH Karis | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 113 | FANG sophie | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 115 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 115 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 76% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 115 | LIN Grace | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 115 | YANG Lea | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 119 | HU Michelle | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 120 | SHANNON Sara | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 121 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.