Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEE Ivan J. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
2 | MATT Chris | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
3 | MAKOGON Sergey | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 48% | 42% |
3 | KEEFER Philip E. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
5 | BACON Michael F. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
6 | YUNG Wang Y. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
6 | KOPYLOV Dmitri | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
8 | HECK Steven D. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% |
9 | BUKOWSKI Todd | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
10 | MALNATI Donald H. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% |
11 | LEAR Donald W. | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% | - |
12 | ZIRKLE James | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
13 | ELDER John | 10% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
14 | DASHNAW Stephen | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 16% | 49% | 33% |
15 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
16 | MIGHELL Jason | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
17 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
18 | GRAFF Jon | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
19 | DAWSON Todd | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
20 | MEHTA Nalin J. | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
21 | SAMOTESSOV Vladislav | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
22 | PARAGANO Vincent | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | - |
23 | SIMS Martin L. | 43% | 48% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
24 | BAKER Keith L. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
25 | LIBERS Alexander M. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | MCLAUGHLIN Joseph R. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
27 | KORINTH Steve | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
28 | DI GENNARO John | 1% | 15% | 45% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.