New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 2 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 3 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% | |
| 3 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 5 | WU Jerry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 6 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 7 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 8 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 9 | HOWARD Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 10 | HOWELL Thomas A. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | SCHULTES Evans | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 12 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
| 13 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | SPOSATO Luke B. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 1% | |
| 15 | WAN Jason | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | REILLY Brandon | 100% | 82% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | HEMINGWAY Liam | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | RAMIREZ Daniel A. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.