The Bull City RJCC, RYC & Y8

Cadet Women’s Saber (CDTWS)

Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 10:30 AM

Register

LeRoy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex, NC Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2512 2610 - 2398
5 - 8 2251 2333 - 2086
9 - 16 1942 2053 - 1883
17 - 25 1457 1848 - 925

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pantaleon-Mazola, Amari Nellya Fencers C23 2610 2356.62
2 Huchwajda, Pola Research Triangle Fencing C23 2580 2188.75
3 Carter, Keely Research Triangle Fencing C23 2459 2173.75
4 Dantuluri, Shalini Nellya Fencers B23 2398 2144.76
5 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2333 2075.67
6 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club U 2311 2049.61
7 Xie, Nora Forge Fencing Teams D23 2273 2012.88
8 Barroso, Isabela Nova Fencing Club E23 2086 1815.86
9 Padanilam, Lily Nellya Fencers D23 2053 1786.17
10 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy E23 1948 1692.18
11 Huang, Neila Forge Fencing Teams D23 1952 1685.43
12 Nadkarni, Marisa Capital Fencing Academy E23 1931 1657.82
13 Latyshava, Stephanie Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D23 1887 1610.70
14 Tan, Kylie Nellya Fencers D23 1979 1601.64
15 Ellis-Furlong, Ava Forge Fencing Teams D23 1900 1584.61
16 Wunnava, Ellora Forge Fencing Teams E23 1883 1580.16
17 Sebastian, Ava Middle Tennessee Fencing Club U 1848 1551.72
18 Maragh, Farrah Nazlymov Fencing Foundation E23 1727 1320.81
19 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club U 1484 1176.95
20 Mueller, Sarah Forge Fencing Teams U 1530 1112.94
21 Coovadia, Malina Forge Fencing Teams U 1417 1039.87
22 Dantuluri, Shivani Nellya Fencers U 1413 1020.95
23 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams U 1351 1013.75
24 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club U 1420 922.42
25 Lozier, Camryn Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 925 269.10

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!