Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KLYCZEK Andrew | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 32% | 2% |
2 | GALEMORE Jonathan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
3 | DATLA Meha | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
3 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
5 | ISAACSON Bjorn | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
6 | DATLA Medha | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
7 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
8 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
9 | PRICE Owen | - | 9% | 37% | 41% | 13% | |
10 | SEMP Iain | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
11 | TOMASI John | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
12 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
13 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% |
14 | DYER John G. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 42% |
15 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 2% | 28% | 46% | 20% | 3% | |
16 | SHANKS Aidan T. | 9% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 1% | - |
17 | SHAH Suhani | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
18 | JOHN AYI Neville Pascal | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
19 | ALLENSHORT Luke | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
20 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
21 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | |
22 | MORRIS Luke | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
23 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
24 | LIMM Christopher | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
25 | ALLEN Lily | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
26 | TREADWAY Ella | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
27 | FISCHMAN Margaret | 73% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
28 | SHANKS Jennifer | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
29 | ZIMSKY James | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.