Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KLYCZEK Andrew | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 32% | 2% |
| 2 | GALEMORE Jonathan | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
| 3 | DATLA Meha | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 5 | ISAACSON Bjorn | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 6 | DATLA Medha | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 7 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 8 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | PRICE Owen | - | 9% | 37% | 41% | 13% | |
| 10 | SEMP Iain | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
| 11 | TOMASI John | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | MAHNKEN Thomas P. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% |
| 14 | DYER John G. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 42% |
| 15 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 2% | 28% | 46% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | SHANKS Aidan T. | 9% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SHAH Suhani | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | JOHN AYI Neville Pascal | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ALLENSHORT Luke | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 20 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | |
| 22 | MORRIS Luke | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | LAU-ALLEN Macy | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | LIMM Christopher | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 25 | ALLEN Lily | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | TREADWAY Ella | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | - |
| 27 | FISCHMAN Margaret | 73% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | SHANKS Jennifer | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 29 | ZIMSKY James | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.