Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | V D V V V D | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 4 | -1.5 |
| 3 | ZOBEL Eric H. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 3 | ADLER David R. | D V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 5 | LI Eric | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | BING Charles | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 7 | DU Samuel R. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | LI Arvin | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | MCLEAN Miles K. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 10 | JIMENEZ Diran | V V V V V D | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 11 | SHIN Joshua J. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 12 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 13 | MIALL Steven A. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 14 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 15 | JIANG Owen | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | SHAO Eric | V D V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 17 | PAN Eric | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | BUCKLEY-JONES Henry C. | V V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 19 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 20 | GUPTA Varun | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 21 | WANG Mason | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 22 | MENG Zhaoyi | V V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 23 | LACHAPELLE Cole | V D V V D V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 24 | WANG Michael | V V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 25 | TSAI Max W. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 26 | ZHAO Jesse | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 27 | HOWARD Michael | V V D D V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 28 | BOUTIN Nathaniel J. | D V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 29 | CHESSA Giovanni | D V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 30 | GONG Benjamin | D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 31 | SULLIVAN Matthew | D D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 32 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 33 | BOOTHMAN Colby | V V D V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 34 | SANCHEZ Leon D. | D V V D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 35 | QI Steve | D D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 36 | LI Ayren | D V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 37 | MOO Gareth G. | V D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | THADHANI Elio | V V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | ZHENG Harrison | V D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 40 | ABRUZZESE Owen | D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 41 | JIN Dennis H. | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 42 | GARDINER Luke J. | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 43 | WILBERT Matt | D D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 44 | ABANILLA Luke | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | BOUSSY Luciano | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | BERGERON Justin | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 47 | BANSAL Rahul | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | EBERMAN Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 49 | DENG Kenny | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 50 | VU Evan | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 51 | LICCIARDI Davin | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 52 | HO Jor Sam (Terry) | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 53 | ZHAO Brandon | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 54 | KONG Luculentus X. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 54 | FENG Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.